Ek second…
Meesho counts what share of your ratings are 1 or 2 star, and that one percentage decides how many buyers see your catalog. Here, lower is better. Find your zone, and how long recovery actually takes once you account for the bad ratings still arriving.
Updated August 2026 · checked against supplier.meesho.com
Lower is better. The score is your share of 1 and 2 star ratings.
Over 25%, and the catalog stops being shown. Nothing else you do matters until this comes down.
You cannot delete a bad rating. You can only outnumber it. So the question is not how many good ratings you collect, it is what share of your new buyers are still unhappy.
You need about 107 more ratings to get down to 15%.
At 15% of buyers rating, that is roughly 714 orders, or about 2.4 months at 300 a month.
Every quality score tool asks how many good ratings you need, and answers it assuming not one future buyer will be unhappy. That is not a small simplification. It is the difference between a fixable problem and a permanent one.
A bad rating cannot be removed. It can only be outnumbered. So the score does not settle where you want it to, it settles at the rate new bad ratings arrive. If one in six buyers is still unhappy, a score of 15% is unreachable at any order volume, ever. You could ship a million parcels and finish exactly where you started.
Which turns the question around. It is not how many orders you need. It is whether the product still generates complaints at the rate it used to.
| If your new bad rate is | Ratings needed | At 45 ratings a month |
|---|---|---|
| 0%, nobody complains again | 36 | under a month |
| 5%, one in twenty | 54 | about 1.2 months |
| 10%, one in ten | 107 | about 2.4 months |
| 14%, just under target | 531 | nearly a year |
| 15% or more | never | never |
Starting from 8 bad ratings out of 18, aiming for 15%. Notice how the number explodes as the incoming rate approaches the target, and then stops existing entirely.
Only your 1 and 2 star ratings, as a share of all ratings. Unlike an average rating, lower is better here. It gates how much traffic Meesho sends a catalog: under 15% earns a view boost, and over 25% the catalog stops being shown.
Because a bad rating cannot be deleted, only diluted. If a third of your new buyers are still unhappy, you are adding bad ratings as fast as you outnumber the old ones, and the score settles at that same rate. Volume only helps once the incoming bad rate is below your target.
It depends entirely on how many of your new ratings will also be bad. Going from 44% to 15% takes 36 new ratings if not one future buyer complains, 107 if one in ten does, and is impossible if one in six does. Most calculators quietly assume the first case.
Pehle wajah band karo, phir rating gino. Reviews padho: jo shikayat har hafte dikhti hai, size ho ya photo ya quality, wahi 1 aur 2 star bhej rahi hai. Use theek karo. Jab tak nayi kharab rating aati rahegi, score wahin atka rahega.
Nothing else you do matters until the score comes down, because ads and pricing cannot help a listing nobody is shown. Find the complaint that repeats in your reviews, fix it, and if the product genuinely cannot be fixed, relist it properly rather than fighting the old catalog.
No, and a product can look acceptable on one and fail the other. Average rating is a weighted mean of all five levels. Quality score only counts 1 and 2 star ratings as a share of the total, so a pile of 3-star ratings drags your average down while leaving your quality score clean.
They are Meesho’s published bands at the time of writing, and marketplace rules change. Confirm the thresholds in your own supplier panel before making a decision on them. The arithmetic and the reasoning hold whatever the exact cut-offs are.
Upload it and Uncle shows which of the products you are packing right now actually lost money last month, with returns, ads and every fee on its own line.